Xiomára Gonzales nackt sorted by
relevance

Admin05.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Again, it's a motor vehicle stop that we use to protect the wiretap so defendants don't realize that we're on phones [] that it appears that it's just a traffic stop, and from that we attempt to get that package, either by, you know, search warrant, consent, or a plain view.
Admin17.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

In the post-Hortonera, we continued to apply the three-prong plain-view test.
7008
Admin14.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

just got better because [] Height wouldn't be present.
9909
Admin19.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The State contends that, so long as a police officer is lawfully in the place where the plain-view observation is made, it is irrelevant whether the officer harbored the hope -- the ulterior motive -- of making the observation.
5400
Admin31.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

New Hampshire, , 91 S.
Admin15.07.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

Third, the judge accepted Perez's unrefuted testimony that the spilled items were bricks of heroin, which is contraband subject to seizure.
20010
Admin28.08.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The Court finds subjective inquiry into an officer s motives to be at odds with the standard of objective reasonableness that applies to a police officer s conduct under the New Jersey Constitution.
2100
Admin09.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

This exception applies when: 1 the officer is lawfully in the viewing area; 2 the officer discovers evidence "inadvertently," without knowing "in advance where evidence was located nor intend[ing] beforehand to seize it"; and 3 it is "immediately apparent to the officer that items in plain view were evidence of a crime, contraband, or otherwise subject to seizure.
5907
Admin16.06.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

Perez further testified that defendant received several motor vehicle summonses.
9600
Admin06.07.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

A police officer lawfully entering a home under the emergency-aid doctrine in response to an ongoing domestic-violence incident is not obliged to ignore bales of marijuana in plain sight even if he knew the homeowner was a drug dealer.
6707
Admin03.09.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

An arrest at that time, however, would have compromised the ongoing investigation, and therefore the authorities decided to effectuate a routine motor-vehicle stop.
8306